Publications (Hide summaries) (Show abstracts)

We present efficient algorithms for Quantile Join Queries, abbreviated as %JQ. A %JQ asks for the answer at some specified relative position (e.g., 50% for the median) under some ordering over the answers to a Join Query (JQ). Our goal is to avoid materializing the set of all query answers, and to achieve quasilinear time in the size of the database, regardless of the total number of answers. A recent dichotomy result rules out the existence of such an algorithm for a general family of queries and orders. Specifically, for acyclic JQs without self-joins, the problem becomes intractable for ordering by sum whenever we are essentially joining more than two relations. Moreover, even for basic ranking functions beyond sum, such as min or max over different attributes, it has not been known so far whether there is any nontrivial tractable %JQ.
In this work, we develop a new approach to solving %JQ and show how this approach allows not just to recover known results, but also generalize them and resolve open cases. Our solution uses two subroutines: The first one needs to select what we call a ``pivot answer.'' The second subroutine partitions the space of query answers according to this pivot, and continues searching in one partition that is represented as new %JQ over a new database. For pivot selection, we develop an algorithm that, under mild assumptions of monotonicity, works for every ranking function. The second subroutine requires a customized construction for the specific ranking function at hand.
We show the benefit and generality of our approach by using it to establish several new complexity results. First, we prove the tractability of min and max for all acyclic JQs, thereby resolving the above question. Second, we extend the previous dichotomy for sum to all partial sums (over all subsets of the attributes). Third, we handle the intractable cases of sum by devising a deterministic approximation scheme that applies to every acyclic JQ.

We study the question of when we can answer a Conjunctive Query (CQ) with an ordering over the answers by constructing a structure for direct (random) access to the sorted list of answers, without actually materializing this list, so that the construction time is linear (or quasilinear) in the size of the database. In the absence of answer ordering, such a construction has been devised for the task of enumerating query answers of free-connex acyclic CQs, so that the access time is logarithmic. Moreover, it follows from past results that within the class of CQs without self-joins, being free-connex acyclic is necessary for the existence of such a construction (under conventional assumptions in fine-grained complexity).
In this work, we embark on the challenge of identifying the answer orderings that allow for ranked direct access with the above complexity guarantees. We begin with the class of lexicographic orderings and give a decidable characterization of the class of feasible such orderings for every CQ without self-joins. We then continue to the more general case of orderings by the sum of attribute scores. As it turns out, in this case ranked direct access is feasible only in trivial cases. Hence, to better understand the computational challenge at hand, we consider the more modest task of providing access to only one single answer (i.e., finding the answer at a given position). We indeed achieve a quasilinear-time algorithm for a subset of the class of full CQs without self-joins, by adopting a solution of Frederickson and Johnson to the classic problem of selection over sorted matrices. We further prove that none of the other queries in this class admit such an algorithm.

We have made tremendous strides in providing tools for data scientists to discover new tables useful for their analyses. But despite these advances, the proper integration of discovered tables has been under-explored. An interesting semantics for integration, called Full Disjunction, was proposed in the 1980’s, but there has been little progress in using it for data science to integrate tables culled from data lakes. We provide ALITE, a new proposal for integration of tables that may have been discovered using join, union or related table search. We empirically show that ALITE can outperform previous algorithms for computing the Full Disjunction. ALITE relaxes previous assumptions that tables share common attribute names (which completely determine the join columns), are complete (without null values), and have acyclic join patterns. To evaluate ALITE, we develop and share three new benchmarks for integration that use real data lake tables.

Existing techniques for unionable table search define unionability using metadata (tables must have the same or similar schemas) or column-based metrics (for example, the values in a table should be drawn from the same domain). In this work, we introduce the use of semantic relationships between pairs of columns in a table to improve the accuracy of union search. Consequently, we introduce a new notion of unionability that considers relationships between columns, together with the semantics of columns, in a principled way. To do so, we present two new methods to discover semantic relationship between pairs of columns: The first uses an existing knowledge base (KB), the second (which we call a “synthesized KB”) uses knowledge from the data lake itself. We adopt an existing Table Union Search benchmark and present new (open) benchmarks that represent small and large real data lakes. We show that our new unionability search algorithm called SANTOS outperforms a state- of-the-art union search that uses a wide variety of column-based semantics, including word embeddings and regular expressions. We show empirically in all benchmarks that our synthesized KB improves the accuracy of union search by representing relationship semantics that may not be contained in an available KB. This result hints at a promising future of creating a synthesized KB from the data lakes having limited KB coverage and perform union search over them.

Resilience is one of the key algorithmic problems underlying various forms of reverse data management (such as view maintenance, deletion propagation, and various interventions for fairness): What is the minimal number of tuples to delete from a database in order to remove all answers from a query? A long-open question is determining those conjunctive queries (CQs) for which this problem can be solved in guaranteed PTIME. We shed new light on this and the related problem of causal responsibility by proposing a unified Integer Linear Programming (ILP) formulation. It is unified in that it can solve both prior studied restrictions (e.g., self-join-free CQs under set semantics that allow a PTIME solution) and new cases (e.g., all CQs under set or bag semantics It is also unified in that all queries and all instances are treated with the same approach, and the algorithm is guaranteed to terminate in PTIME for the easy cases. We prove that, for all easy self-join-free CQs, the Linear Programming (LP) relaxation of our encoding is identical to the ILP solution and thus standard ILP solvers are guaranteed to return the solution in PTIME. Our approach opens up the door to new variants and new fine-grained analysis: 1) It also works under bag semantics and we give the first dichotomy result for bags semantics in the problem space. 2) We give a more fine-grained analysis of the complexity of causal responsibility. 3) We recover easy instances for generally hard queries, such as instances with read-once provenance and instances that become easy because of Functional Dependencies in the data. 4) We solve an open conjecture from PODS 2020. 5) Experiments confirm that our results indeed predict the asymptotic running times, and that our universal ILP encoding is at times even faster to solve for the PTIME cases than a prior proposed dedicated flow algorithm.

Query Visualization (QV) is the problem of transforming a given query into a graphical representation that helps humans understand its meaning. This task is notably different from designing a Visual Query Language (VQL) that helps a user compose a query. This article discusses the principles of relational query visualization and its potential for simplifying user interactions with relational data.

Analyzing relational languages by their logical expressiveness is well understood. Something not well understood or even formalized is the vague concept of relational query patterns. What are query patterns? And how can we reason about query patterns across different relational languages, irrespective of their syntax and their procedural or declarative nature? In this paper, we formalize the concept of query patterns with a variant of pattern-preserving mappings between the relational atoms of queries. This formalism allows us to analyze the relative pattern expressiveness of relational query languages and to create a hierarchy of languages with equal logical expressiveness yet different pattern expressiveness. In this analysis, relational calculus can expressive more patterns than the basic operators of relational algebra. We additionally contribute an intuitive, complete, and sound diagrammatic representation of safe relational calculus that is not only relationally complete, but can also express all logical patterns for the large and useful fragment of non-disjunctive relational calculus. Among all diagrammatic representations for relational queries that we are aware of, this is the only one that is relationally complete and that can represent all logical patterns in the non-disjunctive fragment.

We study ranked enumeration for Conjunctive Queries (CQs) where the answers are ordered by a given ranking function (e.g., an ORDER BY clause in SQL). We develop "any-k" algorithms which, without knowing the number k of desired answers, push the ranking into joins and avoid materializing the join output earlier than necessary. For this to be possible, the ranking function needs to obey a certain kind of monotonicity; the supported ranking functions include the common sum-of-weights case where query answers are compared by sums of input weights, as well as any commutative selective dioid. One core insight of our work is that the problem is closely related to the fundamental task of path enumeration in a weighted DAG. We generalize and improve upon classic research on finding the k'th shortest path and unify into the same framework several solutions from different areas that had been studied in isolation. For the time to the k'th ranked CQ answer (for every value of k), our approach is optimal in data complexity precisely for the same class of queries where unranked enumeration is optimal -- and only slower by a logarithmic factor. In a more careful analysis of combined complexity, we uncover a previously unknown tradeoff between two different any-k algorithms: one has lower complexity when the number of returned results is small, the other when the number is very large. This tradeoff is eliminated under a stricter monotonicity property that we exploit to design a novel algorithm that asymptotically dominates all previously known alternatives, including the well-known algorithm of Eppstein for sum-of-weights path enumeration. We empirically demonstrate the findings of our theoretical analysis in an experimental study that highlights the superiority of our approach over the join-then-rank approach that existing database systems typically follow.

When processing join queries over big data, a DBMS can become unresponsive, i.e., it takes very long until any output tuples appear. Ranked enumeration addresses this problem by attempting to return the most important answers as quickly as possible, ideally in time that is linear (or quasilinear) in input size, even if the complete output is much larger. Aside from its practical usefulness, ranked enumeration is closely related to, and in a way unifies, several other problems involving joins. The common goal is the design of optimal algorithms that are guaranteed to avoid large intermediate results and thus achieve time or space complexity close to a lower bound. Arguably, avoiding query plans that produce huge intermediate results has been an overarching goal of database optimizers, which is part of the reason why optimal join algorithms, enumeration, and factorized representations have generated a lot of excitement. In this tutorial, we embark on an exploration of these topics, showing how they are intimately connected with a wide range of fundamental problems in computer science.

We consider the problem of finding the minimal-size factorization of the provenance of self-join-free conjunctive queries, i.e., we want to find an equivalent propositional formula that minimizes the number of variable occurrences. Our work is partly motivated from probabilistic inference where read-once formulas are known to allow exact PTIME solutions and non-read-once formulas allow approximate solutions with an error that depends on the number of repetitions of variables. We embark on the challenge of characterizing the data complexity of this problem and show its connection to the query resilience problem. While the problem is NP-complete in general, we develop an encoding as max-flow problem that is guaranteed to give the exact solution for several queries (and otherwise approximate minimizations). We show that our encoding is guaranteed to return a read-once factorization if it exists. Our problem and approach is a complete solution that naturally recovers exact solutions for all known PTIME cases, as well as identifying additional queries for which the problem can be solved in PTIME.

We study full acyclic join queries with general join predicates that involve conjunctions and disjunctions of inequalities, focusing on ranked enumeration where the answers are returned incrementally in an order dictated by a given ranking function. Our approach offers strong time and space complexity guarantees in the standard RAM model of computation, getting surprisingly close to those of equi-joins. With n denoting the number of tuples in the database, we guarantee that for every value of k, the k top-ranked answers are returned in O(n polylog n + k log k) time and O(n polylog n + k) space. This is within a polylogarithmic factor of the best-known guarantee for equi-joins and even O(n+k), the time it takes to look at the input and output k answers. The key ingredient is an O(n polylog n)-size factorized representation of the query output, which is constructed on-the-fly for a given query and database. As a side benefit, our techniques are also applicable to unranked enumeration (where answers can be returned in any order) for joins with inequalities, returning k answers in O(n polylog n + k). This guarantee improves over the state of the art for large values of k. In an experimental study, we show that our ranked-enumeration approach is not only theoretically interesting, but also fast and memory-efficient in practice.

We study the question of when we can answer a Conjunctive Query (CQ) with an ordering over the answers by constructing a structure for direct (random) access to the sorted list of answers, without actually materializing this list, so that the construction time is linear (or quasilinear) in the size of the database. In the absence of answer ordering, such a construction has been devised for the task of enumerating query answers of free-connex acyclic CQs, so that the access time is logarithmic. Moreover, it follows from past results that within the class of CQs without self-joins, being free-connex acyclic is necessary for the existence of such a construction (under conventional assumptions in fine-grained complexity).
In this work, we embark on the challenge of identifying the answer orderings that allow for ranked direct access with the above complexity guarantees. We begin with the class of lexicographic orderings and give a decidable characterization of the class of feasible such orderings for every CQ without self-joins. We then continue to the more general case of orderings by the sum of attribute scores. As it turns out, in this case ranked direct access is feasible only in trivial cases. Hence, to better understand the computational challenge at hand, we consider the more modest task of providing access to only one single answer (i.e., finding the answer at a given position). We indeed achieve a quasilinear-time algorithm for a subset of the class of full CQs without self-joins, by adopting a solution of Frederickson and Johnson to the classic problem of selection over sorted matrices. We further prove that none of the other queries in this class admit such an algorithm.

Modern data lakes are deeply heterogeneous in the vocabulary that is used to describe data. We study a problem of disambiguation in data lakes: how can we determine if a data value occurring more than once in the lake has different meanings and is therefore a homograph? While word and entity disambiguation have been well studied in computational linguistics, data management and data science, we show that data lakes provide a new opportunity for disambiguation of data values since they represent a massive network of interconnected values. We investigate to what extent this network can be used to disambiguate values.
DomainNet uses network-centrality measures on a bipartite graph whose nodes represent values and attributes to determine, without supervision, if a value is a homograph. A thorough experimental evaluation demonstrates that state-of-the-art techniques in domain discovery cannot be re-purposed to compete with our method. Specifically, using a domain discovery method to identify homographs has a precision and a recall of 38% versus 69% with our method on a synthetic benchmark. By applying a network-centrality measure to our graph representation, DomainNet achieves a good separation between homographs and data values with a unique meaning. On a real data lake our top200 precision is 89%.

Node-link visualizations are a familiar and powerful tool for displaying the relationships in a network. The readability of these visualizations highly depends on the spatial layout used for the nodes. In this paper, we focus on computing layered layouts, in which nodes are aligned on a set of parallel axes to better expose hierarchical or sequential relationships. Heuristic-based layouts are widely used as they scale well to larger networks and usually create readable, albeit sub-optimal, visualizations. We instead use a layout optimization model that prioritizes optimality --- as compared to scalability --- because an optimal solution not only represents the best attainable result, but can also serve as a baseline to evaluate the effectiveness of layout heuristics. We take an important step towards powerful and flexible network visualization by proposing STRATIFIMAL LAYOUT, a modular integer-linear-programming formulation that can consider several important readability criteria simultaneously --- crossing reduction, edge bendiness, and nested and multi-layer groups. The layout can be adapted to diverse use cases through its modularity. Individual features can be enabled and customized depending on the application. We provide open-source and documented implementations of the layout, both for web-based and desktop visualizations. As a proof-of-concept, we apply it to the problem of visualizing complicated SQL queries, which have features that we believe cannot be addressed by existing layout optimization models. We also include a benchmark network generator and the results of an empirical evaluation to assess the performance trade-offs of our design choices.

Top-k queries have been studied intensively in the database community and they are an important means to reduce query cost when only the “best” or “most interesting” results are needed instead of the full output. While some optimality results exist, e.g., the famous Threshold Algorithm, they hold only in a fairly limited model of computation that does not account for the cost incurred by large intermediate results and hence is not aligned with typical database-optimizer cost models. On the other hand, the idea of avoiding large intermediate results is arguably the main goal of recent work on optimal join algorithms, which uses the standard RAM model of computation to determine algorithm complexity. This research has created a lot of excitement due to its promise of reducing the time complexity of join queries with cycles, but it has mostly focused on full-output computation. We argue that the two areas can and should be studied from a unified point of view in order to achieve optimality in the common model of computation for a very general class of top-k-style join queries. This tutorial has two main objectives. First, we will explore and contrast the main assumptions, concepts, and algorithmic achievements of the two research areas. Second, we will cover recent, as well as some older, approaches that emerged at the intersection to support efficient ranked enumeration of join-query results. These are related to classic work on k-shortest path algorithms and more general optimization problems, some of which dates back to the 1950s. We demonstrate that this line of research warrants renewed attention in the challenging context of ranked enumeration for general join queries.

We study ranked enumeration of the results to a join query in order of decreasing importance, as imposed by an appropriate ranking function. Our main contribution is a framework for ranked enumeration over a class of Dynamic Programming problems that generalizes seemingly different problems that to date had been studied in isolation. To this end, we study and extend classic algorithms that find the k-shortest paths in a weighted graph. For full conjunctive queries, including cyclic ones, our approach is asymptotically optimal in terms of (1) time to return the top result, (2) delay between results, and (3) time until all results are returned in order. These optimality properties were derived for a complexity measure that has been widely used in the context of worst-case optimal join algorithms, but which abstracts away factors that only depend on query size and a polylogarithmic cost factor in input size. By performing a more detailed cost analysis, we are able to uncover a previously unknown tradeoff between two incomparable enumeration approaches: one has lower complexity when the number of returned results is small, the other when it is large. We demonstrate theoretically and empirically the superiority of our techniques to batch algorithms that produce the full result and then sort it. Interestingly, our technique is not only faster for returning the first few results, but even when all results are produced.

Node classification is an important problem in graph data management. It is commonly solved by various label propagation methods that iteratively pass messages along edges, starting from a few labeled seed nodes. For graphs with arbitrary compatibilities between classes, these methods crucially depend on knowing the compatibility matrix, which must thus be provided by either domain experts or heuristics.
We instead suggest a principled and scalable method for directly estimating the compatibilities from a sparsely labeled graph. This method, which we call distant compatibility estimation, works even on extremely sparsely labeled graphs (e.g., 1 in 10,000 nodes is labeled) in a fraction of the time it later takes to label the remaining nodes. Our approach first creates multiple factorized graph representations (with size independent of the graph) and then performs estimation on these smaller graph sketches. We refer to algebraic amplification as the underlying idea of leveraging algebraic properties of an algorithm’s update equations to amplify sparse signals in data. We show that our estimator is by orders of magnitude faster than alternative approaches and that the end-to-end classification accuracy is comparable to using gold standard compatibilities. This makes it a cheap pre-processing step for any existing label propagation method and removes the current dependence on heuristics.

Understanding the meaning of existing SQL queries is critical for maintaining and reusing them. Yet SQL can be hard to read, even for expert users, and even for the original creator of a query. We conjecture that it is possible to capture the logical intent of queries in automatically-generated visual diagrams that can help users understand the meaning of queries faster and more accurately than reading SQL alone.
We present initial steps in that direction with visual diagrams that are based on the first-order logic foundation of SQL and can capture a substantial fragment of SQL (in particular, deeply nested SQL queries). Our diagrams build upon a rich history of diagrammatic reasoning systems in logics and were designed using a large body of human-computer interaction best practices: they are minimal in that no visual element is superfluous; they are unambiguous in that no two queries with different semantics map to the same visualization; and they extend visual representations of relational schemata and conjunctive queries in a natural way. An experimental evaluation of our visual diagrams on Amazon Turk (n = 42) shows that with only a 2–3 minute static tutorial, participants could interpret queries meaningfully faster with our automatically-generated diagrams than when reading SQL alone. Moreover, we have some evidence that our visual diagrams result in participants making fewer errors than with SQL.
We believe that more regular exposure to diagrammatic representations of SQL can give rise to a pattern-based and thus more intuitive use and re-use of SQL.

We consider running-time optimization for band-joins in a distributed system, e.g., the cloud. To balance load across worker machines, input has to be partitioned, which causes duplication. We explore how to resolve this tension between maximum load per worker and input duplication for band-joins between two relations. Previous work suffered from high optimization cost or considered partitionings that were too restricted (resulting in suboptimal join performance).
Our main insight is that recursive partitioning of the join-attribute space with the appropriate split scoring measure can achieve both low optimization cost and low join cost. It is the first approach that is not only effective for one-dimensional band-joins but also for joins on multiple attributes. Experiments indicate that our method is able to find partitionings that are within 10% of the lower bound for both maximum load per worker and input duplication for a broad range of settings, significantly improving over previous work.

The resilience of a Boolean query is the minimum number of tuples that need to be deleted from the input tables in order to make the query false. A solution to this problem immediately translates into a solution for the more widely known problem of deletion propagation with source-side effects.
In this paper, we give several novel results on the hardness of the resilience problem for binary conjunctive queries with self-joins (i.e. conjunctive queries with relations of maximal arity 2) with one repeated relation. Unlike in the self-join free case, the concept of triad is not enough to fully characterize the complexity of resilience. We identify new structural properties, namely chains, confluences and permutations, which lead to various NP-hardness results. We also give novel involved reductions to network flow to show certain cases are in P. Overall, we give a dichotomy result for the restricted setting when one relation is repeated at most 2 times, and we cover many of the cases for 3.

Speeding up probabilistic inference remains a key challenge in probabilistic databases (PDBs) and the related area of statistical relational learning (SRL). Since computing probabilities for query answers is #P-hard, even for fairly simple conjunctive queries, both the PDB and SRL communities have proposed a number of approximation techniques over the years. The two prevalent techniques are either (i) MCMC style sampling or (ii) branch-and-bound (B&B) algorithms that iteratively improve model-based bounds using a combination of variable substitution and elimination.
We propose a new anytime B&B approximation scheme that encompasses all prior model-based approximation schemes proposed in the PDB and SRL literature. Our approach relies on the novel idea of “scaled dissociation” which can improve both the upper and lower bounds of existing model-based algorithms. We apply our approach to the well-studied problem of evaluating self-join-free conjunctive queries over tuple-independent PDBs, and show a consistent reduction in approximation error in our experiments on TPC-H, Yago3, and a synthetic benchmark setting.

We introduce a new set of problems based on the Chain Editing problem. In our version of Chain Editing, we are given a set of participants and a set of tasks that every participant attempts. For each participant-task pair, we know whether the participant has succeeded at the task or not. We assume that participants vary in their ability to solve tasks, and that tasks vary in their difficulty to be solved. In an ideal world, stronger participants should succeed at a superset of tasks that weaker participants succeed at. Similarly, easier tasks should be completed successfully by a superset of participants who succeed at harder tasks. In reality, it can happen that a stronger participant fails at a task that a weaker participants succeeds at. Our goal is to find a perfect nesting of the participant-task relations by flipping a minimum number of participant-task relations, implying such a "nearest perfect ordering" to be the one that is closest to the truth of participant strengths and task difficulties. Many variants of the problem are known to be NP-hard.

We consider the weighted model counting task which includes important tasks in graphical models, such as computing the partition function and probability of evidence as special cases. We propose a novel partition-based bounding algorithm that exploits logical structure and gives rise to a set of inequalities from which upper (or lower) bounds can be derived efficiently. The bounds come with optimality guarantees under certain conditions and are oblivious in that they require only limited observations of the structure and parameters of the problem. We experimentally compare our bounds with the mini-bucket scheme (which is also oblivious) and show that our new bounds are often superior and never worse on a wide variety of benchmark networks.

Many problems in areas as diverse as recommendation systems, social network analysis, semantic search, and distributed root cause analysis can be modeled as pattern search on labeled graphs (also called "heterogeneous information networks" or HINs). Given a large graph and a query pattern with node and edge label constraints, a fundamental challenge is to find the top-k matches according to a ranking function over edge and node weights. For users, it is difficult to select value k. We therefore propose the novel notion of an any-k ranking algorithm: for a given time budget, return as many of the top-ranked results as possible. Then, given additional time, produce the next lower-ranked results quickly as well. It can be stopped anytime, but may have to continue until all results are returned. This paper focuses on acyclic patterns over arbitrary labeled graphs. We are interested in practical algorithms that effectively exploit (1) properties of heterogeneous networks, in particular selective constraints on labels, and (2) that the users often explore only a fraction of the top-ranked results. Our solution, KARPET, carefully integrates aggressive pruning that leverages the acyclic nature of the query, and incremental guided search. It enables us to prove strong non-trivial time and space guarantees, which is generally considered very hard for this type of graph search problem. Through experimental studies we show that KARPET achieves running times in the order of milliseconds for tree patterns on large networks with millions of nodes and edges.

Anytime approximation algorithms that compute the probabilities of queries over probabilistic databases can be of great use to statistical learning tasks. Those approaches have been based so far on either (i) sampling or (ii) branch-and-bound with model-based bounds. We present here a more general branch-and-bound framework that extends the possible bounds by using "dissociation," which yields tighter bounds.

Detecting conflicts of interest (COIs) is key for guaranteeing the fairness of a peer-review process. In many conference management systems, the COIs of authors and reviewers are self-declared, and the declaration process is time consuming and potentially incomplete. To address this problem, we demonstrate a novel interactive system called PISTIS that assists the declaration process in a semi-automatic manner. Apart from keyword search and simple filtering, our system provides an interactive graphical interface that helps users explore potential COIs based on the heterogenous data sources. To simply the process of declaration, we also recommend latent COIs using a supervised ranking model that can be iteratively refined from the data collected from past declarations. We believe that PISTIS can be useful as an assistant tool in many real world conference management systems

This paper proposes an approach to uncertain query evaluation by which every query is evaluated entirely in the database engine by evaluating a fixed number of query plans, each providing an upper bound on the true probability, then taking their minimum. We provide an algorithm that takes into account important schema information to enumerate only the minimal necessary plans among all possible plans. Importantly, this algorithm is a strict generalization of all known PTIME self-join-free conjunctive queries: A query is in PTIME if and only if our algorithm returns one single plan. Furthermore, our approach is a generalization of a family of efficient ranking functions from graphs to hypergraphs. We also note that the techniques developed in this paper apply immediately to lifted inference from statistical relational models since lifted inference corresponds to PTIME plans in probabilistic databases.

Tuple-independent probabilistic databases (TI-PDBs) handle uncertainty by annotating each tuple with a probability parameter; when the user submits a query, the database derives the marginal probabilities of each output-tuple, assuming input-tuples are statistically independent. While query processing in TI-PDBs has been studied extensively, limited research has been dedicated to the problems of updating or deriving the parameters from observations of query results. Addressing this problem is the main focus of this paper. We introduce Beta Probabilistic Databases (B-PDBs), a generalization of TI-PDBs designed to support both (i) belief updating and (ii) parameter learning in a principled and scalable way. The key idea of B-PDBs is to treat each parameter as a latent, Beta-distributed random variable. We show how this simple expedient enables both belief updating and parameter learning in a principled way, without imposing any burden on regular query processing. We use this model to provide the following key contributions: (i) we show how to scalably compute the posterior densities of the parameters given new evidence; (ii) we study the complexity of performing Bayesian belief updates, devising efficient algorithms for tractable classes of queries; (iii) we propose a soft-EM algorithm for computing maximum-likelihood estimates of the parameters; (iv) we show how to embed the proposed algorithms into a standard relational engine; (v) we support our conclusions with extensive experimental results.

Belief Propagation (BP) is a widely used approximation for exact probabilistic inference in graphical models, such as Markov Random Fields (MRFs). In graphs with cycles, however, no exact convergence guarantees for BP are known, in general. For the case when all edges in the MRF carry the same symmetric, doubly stochastic potential, recent works have proposed to approximate BP by linearizing the update equations around default values, which was shown to work well for the problem of node classification. The present paper generalizes all prior work and derives an approach that approximates loopy BP on any pairwise MRF with the problem of solving a linear equation system. This approach combines exact convergence guarantees and a fast matrix implementation with the ability to model heterogenous networks. Experiments on synthetic graphs with planted edge potentials show that the linearization has comparable labeling accuracy as BP for graphs with weak potentials, while speeding-up inference by orders of magnitude.

Peer review is the most critical process in evaluating an article to be accepted for publication in an academic venue. When assigning a reviewer to evaluate an article, the assignment should be aware of conflicts of interest (COIs) such that the reviews are fair to everyone. However, existing conference management systems simply ask reviewers and authors to declare their explicit COIs through a plain search user interface guided by some simple conflict rules. We argue that such declaration system is not enough to discover all latent COI cases. In this work, we study a graphical declaration system that visualizes the relationships of authors and reviewers based on a heterogeneous co-authorship network. With the help of the declarations, we attempt to detect the latent COIs automatically based on the meta-paths of a heterogeneous network.

We consider the weighted model counting task which includes important tasks in graphical models, such as computing the partition function and probability of evidence as special cases. We propose a novel partition-based bounding algorithm that exploits logical structure and gives rise to a set of inequalities from which upper (or lower) bounds can be derived efficiently. The bounds come with optimality guarantees under certain conditions and are oblivious in that they require only limited observations of the structure and parameters of the problem. We experimentally compare our bounds with the mini-bucket scheme (which is also oblivious) and show that our new bounds are often superior and never worse on a wide variety of benchmark networks.

Several research thrusts in the area of data management have focused on understanding how changes in the data affect the output of a view or standing query. Example applications are explaining query results, propagating updates through views, and anonymizing datasets. These applications usually rely on understanding how interventions in a database impact the output of a query. An important aspect of this analysis is the problem of deleting a minimum number of tuples from the input tables to make a given Boolean query false. We refer to this problem as "the resilience of a query" and show its connections to the well-studied problems of deletion propagation and causal responsibility. In this paper, we study the complexity of resilience for self-join-free conjunctive queries, and also make several contributions to previous known results for the problems of deletion propagation with source side-effects and causal responsibility: (1) We define the notion of resilience and provide a complete dichotomy for the class of self-join-free conjunctive queries with arbitrary functional dependencies; this dichotomy also extends and generalizes previous tractability results on deletion propagation with source side-effects. (2) We formalize the connection between resilience and causal responsibility, and show that resilience has a larger class of tractable queries than responsibility. (3) We identify a mistake in a previous dichotomy for the problem of causal responsibility and offer a revised characterization based on new, simpler, and more intuitive notions. (4) Finally, we extend the dichotomy for causal responsibility in two ways: (a) we treat cases where the input tables contain functional dependencies, and (b) we compute responsibility for a set of tuples specified via wildcards.

How can we tell when accounts are fake or real in a social network? And how can we tell which accounts belong to liberal, conservative or centrist users? Often, we can answer such questions and label nodes in a network based on the labels of their neighbors and appropriate assumptions of homophily ("birds of a feather flock together") or heterophily ("opposites attract"). One of the most widely used methods for this kind of inference is Belief Propagation (BP) which iteratively propagates the information from a few nodes with explicit labels throughout a network until convergence. A well-known problem with BP, however, is that there are no known exact guarantees of convergence in graphs with loops. This paper introduces Linearized Belief Propagation (LinBP), a linearization of BP that allows a closed-form solution via intuitive matrix equations and, thus, comes with exact convergence guarantees. It handles homophily, heterophily, and more general cases that arise in multi-class settings. Plus, it allows a compact implementation in SQL. The paper also introduces Single-pass Belief Propagation (SBP), a localized (or "myopic") version of LinBP that propagates information across every edge at most once and for which the final class assignments depend only on the nearest labeled neighbors. In addition, SBP allows fast incremental updates in dynamic networks. Our runtime experiments show that LinBP and SBP are orders of magnitude faster than standard BP, while leading to almost identical node labels.

This paper proposes a new approach for approximate evaluation of #P-hard queries with probabilistic databases. In our approach, every query is evaluated entirely in the database engine by evaluating a fixed number of query plans, each providing an upper bound on the true probability, then taking their minimum. We provide an algorithm that takes into account important schema information to enumerate only the minimal necessary plans among all possible plans. Importantly, this algorithm is a strict generalization of all known results of PTIME self-join-free conjunctive queries: A query is safe if and only if our algorithm returns one single plan. We also apply three relational query optimization techniques to evaluate all minimal safe plans very fast. We give a detailed experimental evaluation of our approach and, in the process, provide a new way of thinking about the value of probabilistic methods over non-probabilistic methods for ranking query answers.

This paper develops upper and lower bounds for the probability of Boolean functions by treating multiple occurrences of variables as independent and assigning them new individual probabilities. We call this approach dissociation and give an exact characterization of optimal oblivious bounds, i.e. when the new probabilities are chosen independent of the probabilities of all other variables. Our motivation comes from the weighted model counting problem (or, equivalently, the problem of computing the probability of a Boolean function), which is #P-hard in general. By performing several dissociations, one can transform a Boolean formula whose probability is difficult to compute, into one whose probability is easy to compute, and which is guaranteed to provide an upper or lower bound on the probability of the original formula by choosing appropriate probabilities for the dissociated variables. Our new bounds shed light on the connection between previous relaxation-based and model-based approximations and unify them as concrete choices in a larger design space. We also show how our theory allows a standard relational database management system (DBMS) to both upper and lower bound hard probabilistic queries in guaranteed polynomial time.

We propose a novel linear semi-supervised learning formulation that is derived from a solid probabilistic framework: belief propagation. We show that our formulation generalizes a number of label propagation algorithms described in the literature by allowing them to propagate generalized assumptions about influences between classes of neighboring nodes. We call this formulation Semi-Supervised Learning with Heterophily (SSL-H). We also show how the modularization matrix can be learned from observed data with a simple convex optimization framework that is inspired by locally linear embedding. We call this approach Linear Heterophily Estimation (LHE). Experiments on synthetic data show that both approaches combined can learn heterophily of agraph with 1M nodes and 10M edges in under 1min.

Within the context of the ongoing deregulation of the electricity industry, we disprove in the first part the commonly stated assumption that, in theory and under the condition of perfect information, decentralized and centralized unit commitment would lead to the same power quantities traded and, hence, to the same optimal social welfare. We show that, even in the absence of any uncertainties, independent optimization of the individual performance objectives by the decentralized market participants can actually lead to lower efficiency than centralized minimization of total operating cost. This result concerns short-term supply optimization for a given demand, and does not consider long-term investment issues. In the second part, we take the position of an individual market participant in a deregulated electricity market. We investigate the task of optimally self-scheduling generators to maximize profits by using stochastic dynamic programming. With the help of actual price forecast data from the ISO New England electricity wholesale market, we demonstrate the improvements that result from modeling the forecast price errors assuming a Cauchy error distribution instead of the commonly used Normal distribution.

This paper shows that the "default-all propagation" scheme for database annotations can have some problematic semantic consequences. We propose an alternative "minimum-propagation" provenance that fixes the issue and that comes with several desirable properties.

This paper shows how causal reasoning can be used for post-factum data cleaning, where errors are detected after data has been transformed (e.g. by a query) and which need to be corrected in the original input data. We achieve this with a novel way for translating the problem into a SAT and a weighted MAX-SAT problem, and then using very effective existing tools.

This paper describes a human-query interaction pattern in which users re-use existing queries as templates to compose their own queries. This interaction mode is only made possible with new visualization tools which help users understand SQL patterns and the intent of existing SQL queries quickly. QueryViz (now QueryVis) is our new visualization approach.

WebPageDump is a Firefox extension which allows you to save local copies of pages from the Web. It sounds simple, but it's not. The standard "Save page as" function of web browsers fails with most dynamic web pages and this shortcoming was a serious problem for our research. Comes the birth of WebPageDump. We hope you find it useful too.

Within the context of the ongoing deregulation of the electricity industry, we disprove in the first part the commonly stated assumption that, in theory and under the condition of perfect information, decentralized and centralized unit commitment would lead to the same power quantities traded and, hence, to the same optimal social welfare. We show that, even in the absence of any uncertainties, independent optimization of the individual performance objectives by the decentralized market participants can actually lead to lower efficiency than centralized minimization of total operating cost. This result concerns short-term supply optimization for a given demand, and does not consider long-term investment issues.
In the second part, we take the position of an individual market participant in a deregulated electricity market. We investigate the task of optimally self-scheduling generators to maximize profits by using stochastic dynamic programming. With the help of actual price forecast data from the ISO New England electricity wholesale market, we demonstrate the improvements that result from modeling the forecast price errors assuming a Cauchy error distribution instead of the commonly used Normal distribution.
Finally, by taking statistic uncertainties and inter-temporal interdependencies into account, we show in the third part that a generator owner's optimum bid sequence for a centralized auction market is generally above marginal cost. In contrast to current literature, this is true even where absolutely no abuse of market power is involved. We conclude that marginal production costs cannot be used by themselves as baseline for the assessment of market power in electricity markets.